[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <772d86622aea17e1c7b5ac05e096f1a129fc86b4.camel@perches.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Dec 2018 15:22:15 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Himanshu Jha <himanshujha199640@...il.com>,
Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: lars@...afoo.de, Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, jic23@...nel.org,
knaack.h@....de, pmeerw@...erw.net, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-usp@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: iio: ad5933: add binding doc for ad5933
On Mon, 2018-12-03 at 00:20 +0530, Himanshu Jha wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 02, 2018 at 02:57:12PM -0200, Marcelo Schmitt wrote:
> > Add a devicetree documentation for the ad5933 and ad5934 impedance
> > converter, network analyzer.
> >
> > Co-Developed-by: Gabriel Capella <gabriel@...ella.pro>
>
> checkpatch spits out:
>
> WARNING: Non-standard signature: Co-Developed-by:
>
> Co-developed-by Vs Co-Developed-by ?
>
> Documentation/process/5.Posting.rst: - Co-developed-by: states that the patch was also created by another developer
> Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst:12) When to use Acked-by:, Cc:, and Co-Developed-by:
>
> Confusing! Don't know which one is correct.
I think neither one.
What's the real purpose or value of it?
There isn't one as far as I can tell.
Just use Signed-off-by:
Or maybe add multiple "Authored-by:" if
anyone is all that concerned about authorship
crediting...
>
> > Signed-off-by: Marcelo Schmitt <marcelo.schmitt1@...il.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Gabriel Capella <gabriel@...ella.pro>
> > ---
>
> Use `./scripts/get_maintainer.pl <your_patch>` to list the DT
> maintainers and the relevant mailing list.
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists