linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: i2c: Use correct vendor prefix for Atmel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJZJVMvd0aQJ8eDXBqiZ=quLrNGr3hhqePm8fCushHxxQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 3 Dec 2018 14:50:15 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc:     Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
        Linux I2C <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] dt-bindings: i2c: Use correct vendor prefix for Atmel

On Tue, Nov 27, 2018 at 6:50 AM Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 01:51:38PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > From: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
> >
> > The "at," prefix was never correct for Atmel, so fix the few occurrences
> > that got it wrong. Use "atmel," instead.
> >
> > While at it, remove the at,24c08 compatible string from the list of
> > trivial devices because it is already documented in eeprom/at24.txt.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
>
> Peter, I'd assume you are okay with me applying the patch directly?

Didn't we agree that I take trivial devices changes? Normally, it
doesn't really matter, but I'll have to delay landing the json-schema
conversion because this will conflict.

Rob