lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181203225731.GE207198@google.com>
Date:   Mon, 3 Dec 2018 16:57:31 -0600
From:   Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Cc:     Hanjie Lin <hanjie.lin@...ogic.com>,
        Yixun Lan <yixun.lan@...ogic.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Jianxin Pan <jianxin.pan@...ogic.com>,
        Kevin Hilman <khilman@...libre.com>,
        Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>,
        Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne@...b.com>,
        linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Yue Wang <yue.wang@...ogic.com>,
        Qiufang Dai <qiufang.dai@...ogic.com>,
        Jian Hu <jian.hu@...ogic.com>,
        Liang Yang <liang.yang@...ogic.com>,
        Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@...e-electrons.com>,
        Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@...opsys.com>,
        Carlo Caione <carlo@...one.org>,
        linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/2] PCI: amlogic: Add the Amlogic Meson PCIe
 controller driver

On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 04:41:50PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 04:53:54PM +0800, Hanjie Lin wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > +static int meson_pcie_rd_own_conf(struct pcie_port *pp, int where, int size,
> > +				  u32 *val)
> > +{
> > +	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp);
> > +
> > +	/*
> > +	 * there is a bug of MESON AXG pcie controller that software can not
> > +	 * programe PCI_CLASS_DEVICE register, so we must return a fake right
> > +	 * value to ensure driver could probe successfully.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (where == PCI_CLASS_REVISION) {
> > +		*val = readl(pci->dbi_base + PCI_CLASS_REVISION);
> > +		/* keep revision id */
> > +		*val &= PCI_CLASS_REVISION_MASK;
> > +		*val |= PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI << 16;
> > +		return PCIBIOS_SUCCESSFUL;
> > +	}
> 
> As I said before, this looks broken. If this code (or other drivers with
> the same broken assumptions, eg dwc/pcie-qcom.c) carries out a, say,
> byte sized config access of eg PCI_CLASS_DEVICE you will get junk out of
> it according to your comment above.
> 
> I would like to pick Bjorn's brain on this to see what we can really do
> to fix this (and other) drivers.

  - Check to see whether you're reading anything in the 32-bit dword at
    offset 0x08.

  - Do the 32-bit readl().

  - Insert the correct Sub-Class and Base Class code (you also throw
    away the Programming Interface; not sure why that is)

  - If you're reading something smaller than 32 bits, mask & shift as
    needed.  pci_bridge_emul_conf_read() does something similar that
    you might be able to copy.

Out of curiosity, what code depends on PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_PCI?  There
are several places in the kernel that currently depend on it, but I
think several of them *should* be checking dev->hdr_type to identify a
type 1 header instead.

Bjorn

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ