lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 3 Dec 2018 10:59:10 +0100
From:   Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
CC:     <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, <david.safford@...com>,
        <monty.wiseman@...com>, <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <silviu.vlasceanu@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/7] tpm: remove definition of TPM2_ACTIVE_PCR_BANKS

On 11/30/2018 8:45 PM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 11:41:49AM -0800, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
>> Even after looking at the spec the last field does not make sense as the
>> event after digests and digests are not in union. It is just not right.
>>
>> The comment does not fix that.
> 
> You should remove the last field and rename the struct as maybe
> struct tcg_pcr_event2_head. If we ever need the very last field
> we can create struct *_tail.
> 
> Not your fault but there is clear bug in the struct definition
> that should be fixed in a commit of its own.

Given that I explain the problem in the new patch, I would also remove
TPM2_ACTIVE_PCR_BANKS in the same patch. Is it ok?

Thanks

Roberto

> No new comments are needed.
> 
> /Jarkko
> 

-- 
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063
Managing Director: Bo PENG, Jian LI, Yanli SHI

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ