[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181203115850.GB8040@e107981-ln.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 11:58:50 +0000
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
To: "Z.q. Hou" <zhiqiang.hou@....com>,
Subrahmanya Lingappa <l.subrahmanya@...iveil.co.in>
Cc: "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>, Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@....com>,
"M.h. Lian" <minghuan.lian@....com>,
Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] PCI: refactor the Mobiveil driver and add PCIe
support for NXP LX SoCs
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 01:19:03PM +0000, Z.q. Hou wrote:
> From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@....com>
>
> This patch set is aim to refactor the Mobiveil driver and add
> PCIe support for NXP LX series SoCs.
>
> Hou Zhiqiang (23):
> PCI: mobiveil: uniform the register accessors
> PCI: mobiveil: format the code without function change
> PCI: mobiveil: correct the returned error number
> PCI: mobiveil: remove flag MSI_FLAG_MULTI_PCI_MSI
> PCI: mobiveil: correct PCI base address in MEM/IO outbound windows
> PCI: mobiveil: replace the resource list iteration function
> PCI: mobiveil: use WIN_NUM_0 explicitly for CFG outbound window
> PCI: mobiveil: use the 1st inbound window for MEM inbound transactions
> PCI: mobiveil: correct the inbound/outbound window setup routine
> PCI: mobiveil: fix the INTx process error
> PCI: mobiveil: only fixup the Class Code field
> PCI: mobiveil: move out the link up waiting from mobiveil_host_init
> PCI: mobiveil: move irq chained handler setup out of DT parse
> PCI: mobiveil: initialize Primary/Secondary/Subordinate bus number
> dt-bindings: pci: mobiveil: change gpio_slave and apb_csr to optional
> PCI: mobiveil: refactor the Mobiveil driver
> PCI: mobiveil: continue to initialize the host upon no PCIe link
> PCI: mobiveil: disabled IB and OB windows set by bootloader
> PCI: mobiveil: add Byte and Half-Word width register accessors
> PCI: mobiveil: change prototype of function mobiveil_host_init
> dt-bindings: pci: Add NXP LX SoCs PCIe controller
> PCI: mobiveil: add PCIe RC driver for NXP LX series SoCs
> arm64: dts: freescale: lx2160a: add pcie DT nodes
>
> .../devicetree/bindings/pci/lx-pci.txt | 52 ++
> .../devicetree/bindings/pci/mobiveil-pcie.txt | 2 +
> MAINTAINERS | 10 +-
> .../arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-lx2160a.dtsi | 157 ++++
> drivers/pci/controller/Kconfig | 11 +-
> drivers/pci/controller/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Kconfig | 34 +
> drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Makefile | 5 +
> drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pci-lx.c | 222 +++++
> .../controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil-host.c | 622 +++++++++++++
> .../controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil-plat.c | 54 ++
> .../pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.c | 245 +++++
> .../pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.h | 221 +++++
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mobiveil.c | 861 ------------------
> 14 files changed, 1625 insertions(+), 873 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/lx-pci.txt
> create mode 100644 drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Kconfig
> create mode 100644 drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/Makefile
> create mode 100644 drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pci-lx.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil-host.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil-plat.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.h
> delete mode 100644 drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mobiveil.c
Subrahmanya,
for the records, this is the driver *you* are maintaining, aren't you ?
We ask developers to be added to the MAINTAINERS list in order to hold
them accountable, merging a driver upstream means that you need to
actively maintain it, which in turn means reviewing series affecting
its code, like this one.
I will have a look too but it is your responsibility to review these
patches and ACK them accordingly.
So I strongly suggest you start doing it please.
Thanks,
Lorenzo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists