lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 3 Dec 2018 19:20:08 +0530
From:   Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To:     Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@....com>, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu
Cc:     suzuki.poulose@....com, marc.zyngier@....com,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, will.deacon@....com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        punitagrawal@...il.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/8] KVM: arm/arm64: Introduce helpers to manipulate
 page table entries



On 10/31/2018 11:27 PM, Punit Agrawal wrote:
> Introduce helpers to abstract architectural handling of the conversion
> of pfn to page table entries and marking a PMD page table entry as a
> block entry.

Why is this necessary ? we would still need to access PMD, PUD as is
without any conversion. IOW KVM knows the breakdown of the page table
at various levels. Is this something required from generic KVM code ?
  
> 
> The helpers are introduced in preparation for supporting PUD hugepages
> at stage 2 - which are supported on arm64 but do not exist on arm.

Some of these patches (including the earlier two) are good on it's
own. Do we have still mention in commit message about the incoming PUD
enablement as the reason for these cleanup patches ?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ