[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5hlg56y9k3.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 03 Dec 2018 15:22:20 +0100
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Ayman Bagabas <ayman.bagabas@...il.com>,
ALSA Development Mailing List <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Hui Wang <hui.wang@...onical.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...radead.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Kailang Yang <kailang@...ltek.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 2/3] x86: add support for Huawei WMI hotkeys.
On Mon, 03 Dec 2018 15:18:54 +0100,
Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 3, 2018 at 2:00 PM Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de> wrote:
> > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 00:57:37 +0100,
> > Ayman Bagabas wrote:
>
> > > +struct huawei_wmi_priv {
> > > + struct input_dev *idev;
> > > + struct led_classdev cdev;
> > > + acpi_handle handle;
> >
> > Is this handle set in anywhere? I couldn't see it in your patch.
> > If it's supposed to be NULL, passing NULL explicitly makes your
> > intention clearer.
>
> Isn't below an answer?
>
> > > + // Skip registering LED subsystem if no ACPI method was found.
> > > + status = acpi_get_handle(priv->handle, "\\_SB.PCI0.LPCB.EC0", &priv->handle);
Oh indeed, but why it passes priv->handle at the first argument...?
thanks,
Takashi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists