[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181203031823.GE11573@altlinux.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 06:18:23 +0300
From: "Dmitry V. Levin" <ldv@...linux.org>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Breno Leitao <leitao@...ian.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Eugene Syromyatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter@...linux.org>,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4] powerpc/ptrace: replace ptrace_report_syscall() with a
tracehook call
From: Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter@...linux.org>
Arch code should use tracehook_*() helpers, as documented
in include/linux/tracehook.h,
ptrace_report_syscall() is not expected to be used outside that file.
Co-authored-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@...linux.org>
Fixes: 5521eb4bca2d ("powerpc/ptrace: Add support for PTRACE_SYSEMU")
Signed-off-by: Elvira Khabirova <lineprinter@...linux.org>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@...linux.org>
---
v4: rewritten to call tracehook_report_syscall_entry() once, compile-tested
v3: add a descriptive comment
v2: explicitly ignore tracehook_report_syscall_entry() return code
arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
index afb819f4ca68..59c8c9a3d7ea 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/ptrace.c
@@ -3263,27 +3263,43 @@ static inline int do_seccomp(struct pt_regs *regs) { return 0; }
*/
long do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
+ struct thread_info *ti;
+ u32 cached_flags;
+
user_exit();
- if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)) {
- ptrace_report_syscall(regs);
- /*
- * Returning -1 will skip the syscall execution. We want to
- * avoid clobbering any register also, thus, not 'gotoing'
- * skip label.
- */
- return -1;
- }
+ ti = current_thread_info();
+ cached_flags =
+ READ_ONCE(ti->flags) &
+ (TIF_SYSCALL_EMU | TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE | TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT);
- /*
- * The tracer may decide to abort the syscall, if so tracehook
- * will return !0. Note that the tracer may also just change
- * regs->gpr[0] to an invalid syscall number, that is handled
- * below on the exit path.
- */
- if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE) &&
- tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs))
- goto skip;
+ if (cached_flags & (TIF_SYSCALL_EMU | TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE)) {
+ int rc = tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs);
+
+ if (unlikely(cached_flags & _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)) {
+ /*
+ * A nonzero return code from
+ * tracehook_report_syscall_entry() tells us
+ * to prevent the syscall execution, but
+ * we are not going to execute it anyway.
+ *
+ * Returning -1 will skip the syscall execution.
+ * We want to avoid clobbering any register also,
+ * thus, not 'gotoing' skip label.
+ */
+ return -1;
+ }
+
+ if (rc) {
+ /*
+ * The tracer decided to abort the syscall.
+ * Note that the tracer may also just change
+ * regs->gpr[0] to an invalid syscall number,
+ * that is handled below on the exit path.
+ */
+ goto skip;
+ }
+ }
/* Run seccomp after ptrace; allow it to set gpr[3]. */
if (do_seccomp(regs))
@@ -3293,7 +3309,7 @@ long do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
if (regs->gpr[0] >= NR_syscalls)
goto skip;
- if (unlikely(test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT)))
+ if (unlikely(cached_flags & TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT))
trace_sys_enter(regs, regs->gpr[0]);
#ifdef CONFIG_PPC64
--
ldv
Powered by blists - more mailing lists