linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 05/12] PCI: aardvark: add suspend to RAM support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 3 Dec 2018 16:38:46 +0100
From:   Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
To:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Cc:     "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, sudeep.holla@....com,
        Gregory Clement <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
        Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...tlin.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart@...tlin.com>,
        Maxime Chevallier <maxime.chevallier@...tlin.com>,
        Nadav Haklai <nadavh@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/12] PCI: aardvark: add suspend to RAM support

Hi Lorenzo,

Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com> wrote on Mon, 3 Dec 2018
10:27:08 +0000:

> [+Rafael, Sudeep]
> 
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 03:18:24PM +0100, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> > Add suspend and resume callbacks. The priority of these are
> > "_noirq()", to workaround early access to the registers done by the
> > PCI core through the ->read()/->write() callbacks at resume time.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c
> > index 108b3f15c410..7ecf1ac4036b 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pci-aardvark.c
> > @@ -1108,6 +1108,55 @@ static int advk_pcie_setup_clk(struct advk_pcie *pcie)
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > +static int __maybe_unused advk_pcie_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > +	struct advk_pcie *pcie = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > +
> > +	advk_pcie_disable_phy(pcie);
> > +
> > +	clk_disable_unprepare(pcie->clk);  
> 
> I have noticed it is common practice, still, I would like to check whether
> it is allowed to call functions that may sleep in a NOIRQ suspend/resume
> callback ?

You are right this is weird. I double checked and for instance,
pcie-mediatek.c, pci-tegra.c and pci-imx6.c do the exact same thing. There are
probably other cases where drivers call functions that may sleep from a NOIRQ
context. I am interested to know if this is valid and if not, what is the
alternative?


Thanks,
Miquèl