[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181203165833.GA27796@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 16:58:34 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitriy Cherkasov <dmitriy@...-tech.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>,
"moderated list:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v1 3/4] cpu-topology: Move cpu topology code to
common code.
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 03:28:19PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> Both RISC-V & ARM64 are using cpu-map device tree to describe
> their cpu topology. It's better to move the relevant code to
> a common place instead of duplicate code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h | 22 ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 303 +-------------------------------------
> drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 294 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
Whilst I'm happy seeing this code moved out, I'd like to have an entry in
MAINTAINERS so that somebody can review changes from the arm64 side without
having to poll a load of different lists. I assume patches would still go
via Rafael and Greg, but if we could have Sudeep added as Reviewer for this
file, then I'd really appreciate it.
Cheers,
Will
Powered by blists - more mailing lists