[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181203171223.GD17883@e107155-lin>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 17:12:24 +0000
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitriy Cherkasov <dmitriy@...-tech.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>,
"moderated list:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...ive.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v1 3/4] cpu-topology: Move cpu topology code to
common code.
(Fixed Juri Lelli's email)
On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 04:58:34PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 03:28:19PM -0800, Atish Patra wrote:
> > Both RISC-V & ARM64 are using cpu-map device tree to describe
> > their cpu topology. It's better to move the relevant code to
> > a common place instead of duplicate code.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h | 22 ---
> > arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 303 +-------------------------------------
> > drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 294 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> Whilst I'm happy seeing this code moved out, I'd like to have an entry in
> MAINTAINERS so that somebody can review changes from the arm64 side without
> having to poll a load of different lists. I assume patches would still go
> via Rafael and Greg, but if we could have Sudeep added as Reviewer for this
> file, then I'd really appreciate it.
>
Thanks Will for pointing this. I agree with you and like to be added as
reviewer for this.
Since arch_topology.c was mostly added for ARM/ARM64 and by Juri Lelli
(who is no longer with ARM) and I did review the initial version, I would
like to assume maintenance for this file if both Juri and Greg are OK
with it so that I can keep an eye on this as we expect more changes to
this both for ARM and RISC-V. I am fine if anyone who has contributed
more to this file wants to maintain.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
Powered by blists - more mailing lists