[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181203173132.GJ11614@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 18:31:32 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, tj@...nel.org, johannes.berg@...el.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 25/27] locking/lockdep: Add support for dynamic keys
On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 09:07:00AM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> How about adding this as an additional patch before patch 25/27?
Excellent, thanks!
> diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> index 9a7cca6dc3d4..ce05b9b419f4 100644
> --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
> @@ -725,6 +725,15 @@ static bool assign_lock_key(struct lockdep_map *lock)
> {
> unsigned long can_addr, addr = (unsigned long)lock;
>
> + /*
> + * lockdep_free_key_range() assumes that struct lock_class_key
> + * objects do not overlap. Since we use the address of lock
> + * objects as class key for static objects, check whether the
> + * size of lock_class_key objects does not exceed the size of
> + * the smallest lock object.
> + */
> + BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct lock_class_key) > sizeof(raw_spinlock_t));
> +
> if (__is_kernel_percpu_address(addr, &can_addr))
> lock->key = (void *)can_addr;
> else if (__is_module_percpu_address(addr, &can_addr))
>
> Thanks,
>
> Bart.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists