[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0d5df4a3-c614-572b-45e6-bd29f13ed361@gonehiking.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 11:33:23 -0700
From: Khalid Aziz <khalid@...ehiking.org>
To: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
Cc: "James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/41] scsi: BusLogic: mark expected switch fall-through
On 11/27/18 9:21 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In preparation to enabling -Wimplicit-fallthrough, mark switch cases
> where we are expecting to fall through.
>
> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1056537 ("Missing break in switch")
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@...eddedor.com>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/BusLogic.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/BusLogic.c b/drivers/scsi/BusLogic.c
> index 9cee941f97d6..717eef3ee893 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/BusLogic.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/BusLogic.c
> @@ -2641,6 +2641,7 @@ static int blogic_resultcode(struct blogic_adapter *adapter,
> case BLOGIC_BAD_CMD_PARAM:
> blogic_warn("BusLogic Driver Protocol Error 0x%02X\n",
> adapter, adapter_status);
> + /* fall through */
> case BLOGIC_DATA_UNDERRUN:
> case BLOGIC_DATA_OVERRUN:
> case BLOGIC_NOEXPECT_BUSFREE:
>
Looks good.
Acked-by: Khalid Aziz <khalid@...ehiking.org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists