[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181204163640.GX4170@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 08:36:40 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>
Cc: mingo@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
parri.andrea@...il.com, will.deacon@....com, peterz@...radead.org,
boqun.feng@...il.com, npiggin@...il.com, dhowells@...hat.com,
j.alglave@....ac.uk, luc.maranget@...ia.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH memory-model 0/3] Updates to the formal memory model
On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 12:40:01AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> On 2018/12/03 15:51:27 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 08:28:03AM +0900, Akira Yokosawa wrote:
> >> On 2018/12/03 15:04:11 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >>> Hello, Ingo!
> >>>
> >>> This series contains updates to the Linux kernel's formal memory model
> >>> in tools/memory-model. These patches are ready for inclusion into -tip.
> >>>
> >>> 1. Model smp_mb__after_unlock_lock(), courtesy of Andrea Parri.
> >>>
> >>> 2. Add scripts to check github litmus tests.
> >>>
> >>> 3. Make scripts take "-j" abbreviation for "--jobs".
> >>>
> >>> There is another series in preparation to model SRCU, but this series
> >>> requires hot-off-the presses changes to the herd tool that have not yet
> >>> been released. This SRCU series is therefore targeting the merge window
> >>> after the upcoming one. People wishing to experiment with the prototype
> >>> SRCU model may obtain it from my -rcu tree at branch "dev", and use
> >>> a bleeding-edge herd7 built from https://github.com/herd/herdtools7/,
> >>> version 7.51+2(dev), which is (commit 10403b24070c) or later.
> >>
> >> On the master branch of herdtools7, SRCU support was added in version
> >> 7.51+4(dev), which is commit 6ec9da1f4d58, or later.
> >
> > It has been working for me with version 7.51+2(dev), but perhaps I
> > have just been getting lucky. It wouldn't be the first time! ;-)
>
> Sounds like you've been at the HEAD of topic branch "srcu".
You are quite right. And this situation does confirm the wisdom of
waiting until a herd release containing the SRCU support. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
> Thanks, Akira
> >
> > Thanx, Paul
> >
> >> Thanks, Akira
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Thanx, Paul
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> .gitignore | 1
> >>> README | 2
> >>> linux-kernel.bell | 3
> >>> linux-kernel.cat | 4 -
> >>> linux-kernel.def | 1
> >>> scripts/README | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> scripts/checkalllitmus.sh | 53 +++++++----------
> >>> scripts/checkghlitmus.sh | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> scripts/checklitmus.sh | 74 +++--------------------
> >>> scripts/checklitmushist.sh | 60 +++++++++++++++++++
> >>> scripts/cmplitmushist.sh | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> scripts/initlitmushist.sh | 68 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> scripts/judgelitmus.sh | 78 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> scripts/newlitmushist.sh | 61 +++++++++++++++++++
> >>> scripts/parseargs.sh | 140 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >>> scripts/runlitmushist.sh | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> 16 files changed, 757 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-)
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists