linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -V7 RESEND 08/21] swap: Support to read a huge swap cluster for swapin a THP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 04 Dec 2018 10:30:41 +0800
From:   "Huang\, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>
To:     Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com>
Cc:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
        Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
        Zi Yan <zi.yan@...rutgers.edu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -V7 RESEND 08/21] swap: Support to read a huge swap cluster for swapin a THP

Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com> writes:

> On Sat, Dec 01, 2018 at 08:34:06AM +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
>> Daniel Jordan <daniel.m.jordan@...cle.com> writes:
>> > What do you think?
>> 
>> I think that swapoff() which is the main user of try_to_unuse() isn't a
>> common operation in practical.  So it's not necessary to make it more
>> complex for this.
>
> Ok, probably not worth the surgery on try_to_unuse, even if swapoff can be
> expensive when it does happen.
>
>> In alloc_hugepage_direct_gfpmask(), the only information provided by vma
>> is: vma->flags & VM_HUGEPAGE.  Because we have no vma available, I think
>> it is OK to just assume that the flag is cleared.  That is, rely on
>> system-wide THP settings only.
>> 
>> What do you think about this proposal?
>
> Sounds like a good compromise.
>
> So alloc_hugepage_direct_gfpmask will learn to make 'vma' optional?  Slightly
> concerned that future callers that should be passing vma's might not and open a
> way to ignore vma huge page hints, but probably not a big deal in practice.  

alloc_pages_vma() -> get_vma_policy() -> __get_vma_policy()

has done that already.  So I guess that's not a big issue.  The callers
should be careful.

Best Regards,
Huang, Ying