[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADYN=9LNunVkSTzg1fri7Mu7mbu8gFPpgnFfCRQk4T61JXt1_A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 20:25:31 +0100
From: Anders Roxell <anders.roxell@...aro.org>
To: rostedt@...dmis.org
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tracing: add cond_resched to ftrace_replace_code()
On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 at 20:21, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 4 Dec 2018 14:19:08 -0500
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
>
> > > @@ -2435,6 +2438,13 @@ void __weak ftrace_replace_code(int enable)
> > > /* Stop processing */
> > > return;
> > > }
> > > + /*
> > > + * Some archs calls this function with interrupts or preemption
> > > + * disabled. Howeve, other archs don't and this can cause a
>
> typo "However". But could you write it this way:
>
> "However, for other archs that can preempt, this can cause an
> tremendous unneeded latency."
>
I'll fix this and move it up (where I added it in the first place but
moved it) =)
Cheers,
Anders
> Thanks!
>
> -- Steve
>
> > > + * tremendous unneeded latency.
> > > + */
> >
> > Actually, could you move the comment up where schedulable gets set?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > -- Steve
> >
> > > + if (schedulable)
> > > + cond_resched();
> > > } while_for_each_ftrace_rec();
> > > }
> > >
> >
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists