[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181204204810.GU28501@garbanzo.do-not-panic.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 12:48:10 -0800
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...gle.com>, shuah@...nel.org,
Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>, mpe@...erman.id.au,
joe@...ches.com, brakmo@...com, rostedt@...dmis.org,
Tim.Bird@...y.com, khilman@...libre.com,
Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
jdike@...toit.com, richard@....at, linux-um@...ts.infradead.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org,
kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com,
Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
Knut Omang <knut.omang@...cle.com>,
Felix Guo <felixguoxiuping@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v3 11/19] kunit: add Python libraries for handing KUnit
config and kernel
On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 03:50:48PM -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 7:44 PM Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 11:36:28AM -0800, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > > The ultimate goal is to create minimal isolated test binaries; in the
> > > meantime we are using UML to provide the infrastructure to run tests, so
> > > define an abstract way to configure and run tests that allow us to
> > > change the context in which tests are built without affecting the user.
> > > This also makes pretty and dynamic error reporting, and a lot of other
> > > nice features easier.
> > >
> > > kunit_config.py:
> > > - parse .config and Kconfig files.
> > >
> > >
> > > kunit_kernel.py: provides helper functions to:
> > > - configure the kernel using kunitconfig.
> >
> > We get the tools to run the config stuff, build, etc, but not a top
> > level 'make kunitconfig' or whatever. We have things like 'make
> > kvmconfig' and 'make xenconfig', I think it would be reasonable to
> > add similar for this.
>
> Are you just asking for a defconfig for KUnit, or are you asking for a
> way to run KUnit from make?
At least the first. The later seems intrusive as a top level Makefile
thing.
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists