[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181204070033.GG3073@unbuntlaptop>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 10:00:33 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ptp: fix an IS_ERR() vs NULL check
Hi Greg,
I meant to CC you but I screwed up and added you to the From header
instead... :(
Why did you commit 3b1ad360acad ("pps: using ERR_PTR instead of NULL
while pps_register_source fails")? You're not listed as a maintainer so
I wouldn't have known to CC you.
The back story is that the last chunk which changes drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c
was dropped by mistake and it's not there in linux-next. I wrote a
patch which adds it, but everyone is super confused now... Here is
YueHaibing's original patch btw, for reference.
https://www.spinics.net/lists/netdev/msg535929.html
regards,
dan carpenter
On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 08:42:57PM -0800, Richard Cochran wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 01:55:06PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > We recently modified pps_register_source() to return error pointers
> > instead of NULL but this check wasn't updated.
>
> But it *was* updated!
>
> > Fixes: 3b1ad360acad ("pps: using ERR_PTR instead of NULL while pps_register_source fails")
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> > ---
> > v2: Use the correct Fixes tag. Add Greg to the CC list, because he
> > is maintaining this driver.
>
> What driver? (I am maintaining drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c)
>
> > drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c b/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c
> > index 8a81eecc0ecd..48f3594a7458 100644
> > --- a/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c
> > +++ b/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c
> > @@ -265,8 +265,8 @@ struct ptp_clock *ptp_clock_register(struct ptp_clock_info *info,
> > pps.mode = PTP_PPS_MODE;
> > pps.owner = info->owner;
> > ptp->pps_source = pps_register_source(&pps, PTP_PPS_DEFAULTS);
> > - if (!ptp->pps_source) {
> > - err = -EINVAL;
> > + if (IS_ERR(ptp->pps_source)) {
> > + err = PTR_ERR(ptp->pps_source);
> > pr_err("failed to register pps source\n");
> > goto no_pps;
> > }
>
> YueHaibing's patch has the following hunk. It really is already
> there. I don't see it yet on Linus' master branch, but the patch
> should update drivers/pps/kapi.c and the callers all in one commit.
>
> diff --git a/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c b/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c
> index 8a81eec..48f3594 100644
> --- a/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c
> +++ b/drivers/ptp/ptp_clock.c
> @@ -265,8 +265,8 @@ struct ptp_clock *ptp_clock_register(struct ptp_clock_info *info,
> pps.mode = PTP_PPS_MODE;
> pps.owner = info->owner;
> ptp->pps_source = pps_register_source(&pps, PTP_PPS_DEFAULTS);
> - if (!ptp->pps_source) {
> - err = -EINVAL;
> + if (IS_ERR(ptp->pps_source)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(ptp->pps_source);
> pr_err("failed to register pps source\n");
> goto no_pps;
> }
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists