[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFgQCTvQBC11=4eGQ6T9vyB+KOznFCr4hjdg1wwD8GotSRWpDg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 15:20:13 +0800
From: Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com>
To: richard.weiyang@...il.com
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/alloc: fallback to first node if the wanted node offline
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 2:54 PM Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 11:05:57AM +0800, Pingfan Liu wrote:
> >During my test on some AMD machine, with kexec -l nr_cpus=x option, the
> >kernel failed to bootup, because some node's data struct can not be allocated,
> >e.g, on x86, initialized by init_cpu_to_node()->init_memory_less_node(). But
> >device->numa_node info is used as preferred_nid param for
>
> could we fix the preferred_nid before passed to
> __alloc_pages_nodemask()?
>
Yes, we can doit too, but what is the gain?
> BTW, I don't catch the function call flow to this point. Would you mind
> giving me some hint?
>
You can track the code along slab_alloc() ->...->__alloc_pages_nodemask()
Thanks,
Pingfan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists