[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <723e6e0b-9469-4b11-9571-a65ef4f830f0@default>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 09:21:11 +0000 (UTC)
From: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>
To: <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...nel.org>, <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: <srinivas.eeda@...cle.com>, <joe.jin@...cle.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] tick/broadcast: Remove redundant code in
tick_check_new_device()
Hi Maintainers,
When cleanup my mailbox for free space, I see this patch is missed in upstream.
Checked code again, I think that code indeed could be removed safely.
So could anyone Ack or NAK it? Thanks very much.
Regards
Zhenzhong
----- zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com wrote:
> There is no way a timer used as broadcast clockevent device is also
> used as
> percpu tick clockevent device currently.
>
> -v2: remove meaningless description suggested by tglx
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.duan@...cle.com>
> ---
> kernel/time/tick-common.c | 7 +------
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-common.c b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
> index 49edc1c..9bcc866 100644
> --- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c
> +++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c
> @@ -320,13 +320,8 @@ void tick_check_new_device(struct
> clock_event_device *newdev)
>
> /*
> * Replace the eventually existing device by the new
> - * device. If the current device is the broadcast device, do
> - * not give it back to the clockevents layer !
> + * device.
> */
> - if (tick_is_broadcast_device(curdev)) {
> - clockevents_shutdown(curdev);
> - curdev = NULL;
> - }
> clockevents_exchange_device(curdev, newdev);
> tick_setup_device(td, newdev, cpu, cpumask_of(cpu));
> if (newdev->features & CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_ONESHOT)
> --
> 1.7.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists