[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181204002833.55452-12-bvanassche@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 16:28:20 -0800
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: mingo@...hat.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, tj@...nel.org, longman@...hat.com,
johannes.berg@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: [PATCH v2 11/24] locking/lockdep: Remove a superfluous INIT_LIST_HEAD() statement
Initializing a list entry just before it is passed to list_add_tail_rcu()
is not necessary because list_add_tail_rcu() overwrites the next and prev
pointers anyway. Hence remove the INIT_LIST_HEAD() statement.
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
---
kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
index 81388d028ac7..346b5a1fd062 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c
@@ -792,7 +792,6 @@ register_lock_class(struct lockdep_map *lock, unsigned int subclass, int force)
class->key = key;
class->name = lock->name;
class->subclass = subclass;
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&class->lock_entry);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&class->locks_before);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&class->locks_after);
class->name_version = count_matching_names(class);
--
2.20.0.rc1.387.gf8505762e3-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists