lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20181204103652.612267666@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue,  4 Dec 2018 11:49:04 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Junaid Shahid <junaids@...gle.com>,
        Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 063/139] kvm: mmu: Fix race in emulated page table writes

4.19-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Junaid Shahid <junaids@...gle.com>

commit 0e0fee5c539b61fdd098332e0e2cc375d9073706 upstream.

When a guest page table is updated via an emulated write,
kvm_mmu_pte_write() is called to update the shadow PTE using the just
written guest PTE value. But if two emulated guest PTE writes happened
concurrently, it is possible that the guest PTE and the shadow PTE end
up being out of sync. Emulated writes do not mark the shadow page as
unsync-ed, so this inconsistency will not be resolved even by a guest TLB
flush (unless the page was marked as unsync-ed at some other point).

This is fixed by re-reading the current value of the guest PTE after the
MMU lock has been acquired instead of just using the value that was
written prior to calling kvm_mmu_pte_write().

Signed-off-by: Junaid Shahid <junaids@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c |   27 +++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c
@@ -5013,9 +5013,9 @@ static bool need_remote_flush(u64 old, u
 }
 
 static u64 mmu_pte_write_fetch_gpte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t *gpa,
-				    const u8 *new, int *bytes)
+				    int *bytes)
 {
-	u64 gentry;
+	u64 gentry = 0;
 	int r;
 
 	/*
@@ -5027,22 +5027,12 @@ static u64 mmu_pte_write_fetch_gpte(stru
 		/* Handle a 32-bit guest writing two halves of a 64-bit gpte */
 		*gpa &= ~(gpa_t)7;
 		*bytes = 8;
-		r = kvm_vcpu_read_guest(vcpu, *gpa, &gentry, 8);
-		if (r)
-			gentry = 0;
-		new = (const u8 *)&gentry;
 	}
 
-	switch (*bytes) {
-	case 4:
-		gentry = *(const u32 *)new;
-		break;
-	case 8:
-		gentry = *(const u64 *)new;
-		break;
-	default:
-		gentry = 0;
-		break;
+	if (*bytes == 4 || *bytes == 8) {
+		r = kvm_vcpu_read_guest_atomic(vcpu, *gpa, &gentry, *bytes);
+		if (r)
+			gentry = 0;
 	}
 
 	return gentry;
@@ -5146,8 +5136,6 @@ static void kvm_mmu_pte_write(struct kvm
 
 	pgprintk("%s: gpa %llx bytes %d\n", __func__, gpa, bytes);
 
-	gentry = mmu_pte_write_fetch_gpte(vcpu, &gpa, new, &bytes);
-
 	/*
 	 * No need to care whether allocation memory is successful
 	 * or not since pte prefetch is skiped if it does not have
@@ -5156,6 +5144,9 @@ static void kvm_mmu_pte_write(struct kvm
 	mmu_topup_memory_caches(vcpu);
 
 	spin_lock(&vcpu->kvm->mmu_lock);
+
+	gentry = mmu_pte_write_fetch_gpte(vcpu, &gpa, &bytes);
+
 	++vcpu->kvm->stat.mmu_pte_write;
 	kvm_mmu_audit(vcpu, AUDIT_PRE_PTE_WRITE);
 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ