[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181204105908.GC530@jagdpanzerIV>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 19:59:08 +0900
From: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: don't unconditionally shortcut print_time()
On (12/04/18 19:06), Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> On 2018/12/04 11:56, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> > Can we please have something better than 'f'?
>
> OK. To pass 80 column limit, one line increased. ;-)
Ah, so that was the reason :)
[..]
> To close this race, get a snapshot value of printk_time and pass it to
> SYSLOG_ACTION_READ, SYSLOG_ACTION_READ_ALL, SYSLOG_ACTION_SIZE_UNREAD and
> kmsg_dump_get_buffer().
>
> Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
> Acked-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
-ss
Powered by blists - more mailing lists