linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] coresight: cpu-debug: Support for CA73 CPUs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 4 Dec 2018 08:31:35 +0800
From:   leo.yan@...aro.org
To:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
Cc:     Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coresight: cpu-debug: Support for CA73 CPUs

On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 10:34:07AM -0700, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2018 at 18:22, Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > This patch is to add the AMBA device ID for CA73 CPU, so that CPU debug
> > module can be initialized successfully when a SoC contain CA73 CPUs.
> >
> > This patch has been verified on 96boards Hikey960.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cpu-debug.c | 4 ++++
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cpu-debug.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cpu-debug.c
> > index 45b2460..e8819d7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cpu-debug.c
> > +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-cpu-debug.c
> > @@ -668,6 +668,10 @@ static const struct amba_id debug_ids[] = {
> >                 .id     = 0x000bbd08,
> >                 .mask   = 0x000fffff,
> >         },
> > +       {       /* Debug for Cortex-A73 */
> > +               .id     = 0x000bbd09,
> > +               .mask   = 0x000fffff,
> > +       },
> >         { 0, 0 },
> >  };
> >
> 
> I have picked this up - thanks.

Thanks, Mathieu.