linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.14 042/146] btrfs: tree-checker: Check level for leaves and nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181204103728.556395072@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue,  4 Dec 2018 11:48:48 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>,
        Su Yue <suy.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 042/146] btrfs: tree-checker: Check level for leaves and nodes

4.14-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

commit f556faa46eb4e96d0d0772e74ecf66781e132f72 upstream.

Although we have tree level check at tree read runtime, it's completely
based on its parent level.
We still need to do accurate level check to avoid invalid tree blocks
sneak into kernel space.

The check itself is simple, for leaf its level should always be 0.
For nodes its level should be in range [1, BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL - 1].

Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: Su Yue <suy.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
[bwh: Backported to 4.14:
 - Pass root instead of fs_info to generic_err()
 - Adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
index 31756bac75b4..fa8f64119e6f 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/tree-checker.c
@@ -447,6 +447,13 @@ static int check_leaf(struct btrfs_root *root, struct extent_buffer *leaf,
 	u32 nritems = btrfs_header_nritems(leaf);
 	int slot;
 
+	if (btrfs_header_level(leaf) != 0) {
+		generic_err(root, leaf, 0,
+			"invalid level for leaf, have %d expect 0",
+			btrfs_header_level(leaf));
+		return -EUCLEAN;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * Extent buffers from a relocation tree have a owner field that
 	 * corresponds to the subvolume tree they are based on. So just from an
@@ -589,9 +596,16 @@ int btrfs_check_node(struct btrfs_root *root, struct extent_buffer *node)
 	unsigned long nr = btrfs_header_nritems(node);
 	struct btrfs_key key, next_key;
 	int slot;
+	int level = btrfs_header_level(node);
 	u64 bytenr;
 	int ret = 0;
 
+	if (level <= 0 || level >= BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL) {
+		generic_err(root, node, 0,
+			"invalid level for node, have %d expect [1, %d]",
+			level, BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL - 1);
+		return -EUCLEAN;
+	}
 	if (nr == 0 || nr > BTRFS_NODEPTRS_PER_BLOCK(root->fs_info)) {
 		btrfs_crit(root->fs_info,
 "corrupt node: root=%llu block=%llu, nritems too %s, have %lu expect range [1,%u]",
-- 
2.17.1