lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181204015247.GR12288@mellanox.com>
Date:   Tue, 4 Dec 2018 01:52:54 +0000
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:     Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Guy Levi(SW)" <guyle@...lanox.com>,
        Majd Dibbiny <majd@...lanox.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rdma tree

On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 11:47:31AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the rdma tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64
> allmodconfig) failed like this:
> 
> ERROR: "mlx5_get_send_wqe" [drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.ko] undefined!
> 
> Caused by commit
> 
>   34f4c9554d8b ("IB/mlx5: Use fragmented QP's buffer for in-kernel users")
> 
> mlx5_get_send_wqe() is still used in drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/cq.c
> and declared in drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h ...
> 
> I have used the version of the rdma tree from next-20181203 for today.

Huh. So apparently every compiler that tested this patch (0-day, mine,
the submitters) optimized this call away because is_atomic_response()
always returns 0: meaning mlx5_get_atomic_laddr is never callable and
can be deleted entirely, including the call to mlx5_get_send_wqe.

Not sure what compiler setup will hit this, but it is clearly wrong
code..

Guy/Leon, please send a fixup.. Maybe just delete all this
handle_atomics stuff?

Thanks,
Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ