[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181204150954.GC6809@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 15:09:54 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Priit Laes <plaes@...es.org>
Cc: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Sebastian Reichel <sre@...nel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Olliver Schinagl <oliver@...inagl.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/14] regulator: axp20x: add software based soft_start
for AXP209 LDO3
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 01:31:44PM +0000, Priit Laes wrote:
> Yes, makes sense. Although, should we then also distinguish between
> regulators which support soft-start in hardware and devices which emulate
> it by delay, like in this case?
Drivers should not be emulating soft start, if they need a ramp delay
they should set that in their descriptor and let the framework do it.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists