[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAEExFWtE7Yi8D+Dr=J7B3zqBRet0AX=ABHnUrJkZ2LO3aHdNeg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 23:30:08 +0800
From: Frank Lee <tiny.windzz@...il.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: rajneesh.bhardwaj@...el.com, vishwanath.somayaji@...el.com,
dvhart@...radead.org, andy@...radead.org,
David Box <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] platform/x86: convert to DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE
On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 8:40 PM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 5:59 AM Frank Lee <tiny.windzz@...il.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 4, 2018 at 3:09 AM Andy Shevchenko
> > <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Dec 1, 2018 at 5:52 PM Yangtao Li <tiny.windzz@...il.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Use DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE macro to simplify the code.
> > >
>
> I like your patch, but...
>
> > > By some reason it's not applicable.
> > > Please, rebase on top of our for-next branch, thanks!
>
> > For what reason?
>
> ...because I can't apply it, it fails with conflicts.
>
> > I thought that for-next branch has not changed much.
>
> That's correct, it's updated only by approved patch series which is
> not many _this_ cycle.
I am confused about what you said.
Because I pulled your .git down, there is no conflicts when apply it.......
MBR,
Yangtao
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists