lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 5 Dec 2018 22:21:12 +0800
From:   lijiang <lijiang@...hat.com>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, bhe@...hat.com, dyoung@...hat.com,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2 v2] kdump: add the vmcoreinfo documentation

在 2018年12月05日 19:30, Borislav Petkov 写道:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 05:35:09PM +0800, lijiang wrote:
>> There are more people to review and improve this document together, that would
>> be fine.
> 
> That's basically kernel development :)
> 
>> Generating VMCOREINFO is easy in the first kernel, for example:
>> # makedumpfile -g VMCOREINFO -x vmlinux
> 
> I get:
> 
> $ makedumpfile -g VMCOREINFO -x vmlinux
> The kernel version is not supported.
> The makedumpfile operation may be incomplete.
> 
> The vmcoreinfo is saved to VMCOREINFO.
> 
> makedumpfile Completed.
> 
> But the text file looks ok AFAICT. Please add that command to the
> documentation file.
> 

Ok, no problem.

>> For these two *why*, it should be easy to understand. Because user-space tools
>> need to know basic information, such as the symbol values, field offset, structure
>> size, etc. Otherwise, these tools won't know how to analyze the memory of the crash
>> kernel.
> 
> That's clear. The question is *why* *exactly* is every piece of export
> needed.
> 
>> For the second question 'how they are used', we can get the answer
>> from user-space tools, such as makedumpfile, crash tools. Therefore,
>> it may not need to explain any more in kernel document. On the other
>> hand, if we must put these contents into kernel document, i have to
>> say, that would be a hard task.
> 
> You can put one or two sentences for each, stating what they're used
> for. This way, people can go and look up makedumpfile source code for
> further info and people trying to add new items to VMCOREINFO can look
> in this documentation here first to figure out whether maybe the info
> they need has been exported already.
> 

This is a considerate suggestion.

I will try my best to do that.

Thanks.

Lianbo.

> Thx.
> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ