[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <5C07FC380200007800203394@prv1-mh.provo.novell.com>
Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 09:26:32 -0700
From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To: "Chao Gao" <chao.gao@...el.com>
Cc: "Roger Pau Monne" <roger.pau@...rix.com>,
"Jia-Ju Bai" <baijiaju1990@...il.com>,
"Stefano Stabellini" <sstabellini@...nel.org>,
"xen-devel" <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
"Boris Ostrovsky" <boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>,
"Juergen Gross" <jgross@...e.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xen: xen-pciback: Reset MSI-X state when exposing
a device
>>> On 05.12.18 at 03:19, <chao.gao@...el.com> wrote:
> --- a/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> +++ b/drivers/xen/xen-pciback/pci_stub.c
> @@ -87,6 +87,55 @@ static struct pcistub_device *pcistub_device_alloc(struct pci_dev *dev)
> return psdev;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * Reset Xen internal MSI-X state by invoking PHYSDEVOP_{release, prepare}_msix.
> + */
> +int pcistub_msix_reset(struct pci_dev *dev)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PCI_MSI
> + if (dev->msix_cap) {
> + struct physdev_pci_device ppdev = {
> + .seg = pci_domain_nr(dev->bus),
> + .bus = dev->bus->number,
> + .devfn = dev->devfn
> + };
> + int err;
> + u16 val;
> +
> + /*
> + * Do a write first to flush Xen's internal state to hardware
> + * such that the following read can infer whether MSI-X maskall
> + * bit is set by Xen.
> + */
> + pci_read_config_word(dev, dev->msix_cap + PCI_MSIX_FLAGS, &val);
> + pci_write_config_word(dev, dev->msix_cap + PCI_MSIX_FLAGS, val);
> +
> + pci_read_config_word(dev, dev->msix_cap + PCI_MSIX_FLAGS, &val);
> + if (!(val & PCI_MSIX_FLAGS_MASKALL))
> + return 0;
I'm agreeing with prior comments: I don't see why you need
this conditional.
> + pr_info("Reset MSI-X state for device %04x:%02x:%02x.%d\n",
> + ppdev.seg, ppdev.bus, PCI_SLOT(ppdev.devfn),
> + PCI_FUNC(ppdev.devfn));
> +
> + err = HYPERVISOR_physdev_op(PHYSDEVOP_release_msix, &ppdev);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_warn(&dev->dev, "MSI-X release failed (%d)\n",
> + err);
> + return err;
> + }
> +
> + err = HYPERVISOR_physdev_op(PHYSDEVOP_prepare_msix, &ppdev);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(&dev->dev, "MSI-X preparation failed (%d)\n",
> + err);
Please can you make both log messages distinguishable from
the pre-existing ones, to aid diagnosis of possible probelms?
Jan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists