[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20181205165716.GS1286@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 17:57:16 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
Oscar Salvador <OSalvador@...e.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...il.com>,
Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stable tree <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] hwpoison, memory_hotplug: allow hwpoisoned pages to
be offlined
On Wed 05-12-18 13:29:18, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> After some more thinking I am not really sure the above reasoning is
> still true with the current upstream kernel. Maybe I just managed to
> confuse myself so please hold off on this patch for now. Testing by
> Oscar has shown this patch is helping but the changelog might need to be
> updated.
OK, so Oscar has nailed it down and it seems that 4.4 kernel we have
been debugging on behaves slightly different. The underlying problem is
the same though. So I have reworded the changelog and added "just in
case" PageLRU handling. Naoya, maybe you have an argument that would
make this void for current upstream kernels.
I have dropped all the reviewed tags as the patch has changed slightly.
Thanks a lot to Oscar for his patience and testing he has devoted to
this issue.
Btw. the way how we drop all the work on the first page that we cannot
isolate is just goofy. Why don't we simply migrate all that we already
have on the list and go on? Something for a followup cleanup though.
---
>From 909521051f41ae46a841b481acaf1ed9c695ae7b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2018 10:27:18 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] hwpoison, memory_hotplug: allow hwpoisoned pages to be
offlined
We have received a bug report that an injected MCE about faulty memory
prevents memory offline to succeed on 4.4 base kernel. The underlying
reason was that the HWPoison page has an elevated reference count and
the migration keeps failing. There are two problems with that. First
of all it is dubious to migrate the poisoned page because we know that
accessing that memory is possible to fail. Secondly it doesn't make any
sense to migrate a potentially broken content and preserve the memory
corruption over to a new location.
Oscar has found out that 4.4 and the current upstream kernels behave
slightly differently with his simply testcase
===
int main(void)
{
int ret;
int i;
int fd;
char *array = malloc(4096);
char *array_locked = malloc(4096);
fd = open("/tmp/data", O_RDONLY);
read(fd, array, 4095);
for (i = 0; i < 4096; i++)
array_locked[i] = 'd';
ret = mlock((void *)PAGE_ALIGN((unsigned long)array_locked), sizeof(array_locked));
if (ret)
perror("mlock");
sleep (20);
ret = madvise((void *)PAGE_ALIGN((unsigned long)array_locked), 4096, MADV_HWPOISON);
if (ret)
perror("madvise");
for (i = 0; i < 4096; i++)
array_locked[i] = 'd';
return 0;
}
===
+ offline this memory.
In 4.4 kernels he saw the hwpoisoned page to be returned back to the LRU
list
kernel: [<ffffffff81019ac9>] dump_trace+0x59/0x340
kernel: [<ffffffff81019e9a>] show_stack_log_lvl+0xea/0x170
kernel: [<ffffffff8101ac71>] show_stack+0x21/0x40
kernel: [<ffffffff8132bb90>] dump_stack+0x5c/0x7c
kernel: [<ffffffff810815a1>] warn_slowpath_common+0x81/0xb0
kernel: [<ffffffff811a275c>] __pagevec_lru_add_fn+0x14c/0x160
kernel: [<ffffffff811a2eed>] pagevec_lru_move_fn+0xad/0x100
kernel: [<ffffffff811a334c>] __lru_cache_add+0x6c/0xb0
kernel: [<ffffffff81195236>] add_to_page_cache_lru+0x46/0x70
kernel: [<ffffffffa02b4373>] extent_readpages+0xc3/0x1a0 [btrfs]
kernel: [<ffffffff811a16d7>] __do_page_cache_readahead+0x177/0x200
kernel: [<ffffffff811a18c8>] ondemand_readahead+0x168/0x2a0
kernel: [<ffffffff8119673f>] generic_file_read_iter+0x41f/0x660
kernel: [<ffffffff8120e50d>] __vfs_read+0xcd/0x140
kernel: [<ffffffff8120e9ea>] vfs_read+0x7a/0x120
kernel: [<ffffffff8121404b>] kernel_read+0x3b/0x50
kernel: [<ffffffff81215c80>] do_execveat_common.isra.29+0x490/0x6f0
kernel: [<ffffffff81215f08>] do_execve+0x28/0x30
kernel: [<ffffffff81095ddb>] call_usermodehelper_exec_async+0xfb/0x130
kernel: [<ffffffff8161c045>] ret_from_fork+0x55/0x80
And that later confuses the hotremove path because an LRU page is
attempted to be migrated and that fails due to an elevated reference
count. It is quite possible that the reuse of the HWPoisoned page is
some kind of fixed race condition but I am not really sure about that.
With the upstream kernel the failure is slightly different. The page
doesn't seem to have LRU bit set but isolate_movable_page simply fails
and do_migrate_range simply puts all the isolated pages back to LRU and
therefore no progress is made and scan_movable_pages finds same set of
pages over and over again.
Fix both cases by explicitly checking HWPoisoned pages before we even
try to get a reference on the page, try to unmap it if it is still
mapped. As explained by Naoya
: Hwpoison code never unmapped those for no big reason because
: Ksm pages never dominate memory, so we simply didn't have strong
: motivation to save the pages.
Also put WARN_ON(PageLRU) in case there is a race and we can hit LRU
HWPoison pages which shouldn't happen but I couldn't convince myself
about that.
Debugged-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.com>
Cc: stable
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
---
mm/memory_hotplug.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/memory_hotplug.c b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
index c6c42a7425e5..cfa1a2736876 100644
--- a/mm/memory_hotplug.c
+++ b/mm/memory_hotplug.c
@@ -34,6 +34,7 @@
#include <linux/hugetlb.h>
#include <linux/memblock.h>
#include <linux/compaction.h>
+#include <linux/rmap.h>
#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
@@ -1366,6 +1367,21 @@ do_migrate_range(unsigned long start_pfn, unsigned long end_pfn)
pfn = page_to_pfn(compound_head(page))
+ hpage_nr_pages(page) - 1;
+ /*
+ * HWPoison pages have elevated reference counts so the migration would
+ * fail on them. It also doesn't make any sense to migrate them in the
+ * first place. Still try to unmap such a page in case it is still mapped
+ * (e.g. current hwpoison implementation doesn't unmap KSM pages but keep
+ * the unmap as the catch all safety net).
+ */
+ if (PageHWPoison(page)) {
+ if (WARN_ON(PageLRU(page)))
+ isolate_lru_page(page);
+ if (page_mapped(page))
+ try_to_unmap(page, TTU_IGNORE_MLOCK | TTU_IGNORE_ACCESS);
+ continue;
+ }
+
if (!get_page_unless_zero(page))
continue;
/*
--
2.19.2
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists