linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: Streamline MCE subsystem's naming

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 5 Dec 2018 19:01:58 +0100
From:   Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:     Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
        linux-edac <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: Streamline MCE subsystem's naming


* Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 05, 2018 at 05:30:37PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > Would it make sense to organize it a bit more and separate out vendor 
> > specific functionality:
> > 
> >   mce/cpu/intel.c
> >   mce/cpu/intel-p5.c
> >   mce/cpu/amd.c
> >   mce/cpu/winchip.c
> 
> That's too fine-grained IMO and look at the path we'd get then:
> 
> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/cpu/intel.c
> 		^^^     ^^^

Oh - I thought we'd have arch/x86/mce/ or so?

There's machine check events that are not tied to any particular CPU, 
correct? So this would be the right conceptual level - and it would also 
remove the somewhat redundant 'kernel' part.

Thanks,

	Ingo