[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c1c8fc5a-3829-01ee-5ac4-cb6ab154bdce@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 22:55:15 +0100
From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@...il.com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>,
Mason Yang <masonccyang@...c.com.tw>, broonie@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-spi@...r.kernel.org,
boris.brezillon@...tlin.com, linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc: juliensu@...c.com.tw, Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
zhengxunli@...c.com.tw
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] dt-binding: spi: Document Renesas R-Car Gen3 RPC
controller bindings
On 12/05/2018 07:56 PM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> On 12/04/2018 09:19 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
>
>>> Document the bindings used by the Renesas R-Car Gen3 RPC SPI controller.
>>
>> RPC is SPI and HF controller, it is not a pure SPI controller.
>>
>> How does this deal with the HF part ? Keep in mind the bindings are ABI
>> and it will be difficult to redo them later.
>
> Perhaps we need a "mode" prop, maybe w/vendor prefix?
Or, like I said last time, discern it based on the DT subnode. It can be
either SPI NOR or CFI NOR.
>>> Signed-off-by: Mason Yang <masonccyang@...c.com.tw>
> [...]
>
> MBR, Sergei
>
--
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
Powered by blists - more mailing lists