linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] fieldbus_dev: add Fieldbus Device subsystem.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 5 Dec 2018 23:50:48 +0100
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com>
Cc:     gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, svendev@...x.com,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Andreas Färber <afaerber@...e.de>,
        Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>,
        David Lechner <david@...hnology.com>, noralf@...nnes.org,
        Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
        Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>, michal.vokac@...ft.com,
        John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
        Sebastien Bourdelin <sebastien.bourdelin@...oirfairelinux.com>,
        Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@...c.io>,
        Stuart Yoder <stuyoder@...il.com>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...tlin.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/6] fieldbus_dev: add Fieldbus Device subsystem.

On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 11:32 PM Sven Van Asbroeck <thesven73@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 2:17 PM Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> >
> > Great, then call it a 'fieldbus' class, not "fieldbus_dev' class.
>
> Small nit:
>
> Hardware connected to a fieldbus comes in two distinct flavours:
> - clients (e.g. thermometer, robotic arm) called "fieldbus devices"
> - servers (e.g. a PLC) called "fieldbus controllers"
>
> Their userspace APIs will probably differ quite a lot.
>
> The userspace API created by the patch is only for clients a.k.a.
> "fieldbus devices". That's why I'm writing 'fieldbus_dev' all over the place.
>
> For simplicity, we could change that to just 'fieldbus'. But would this get
> us in trouble when, at some point, we want to add a userspace API for
> servers a.k.a. "fieldbus controllers" ?

In the long run, would you expect to support more devices or more
controllers that need a distinct driver? Whichever we have more of should
probably get the shorter name.

      Arnd