[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jLUJYM3nDDhFeBOKkTnyCR-tXAv-rteBJFMBn_J7kVkqA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2018 16:31:13 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>,
linux-security-module <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
SE Linux <selinux@...ho.nsa.gov>,
John Johansen <john.johansen@...onical.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
Paul Moore <paul@...l-moore.com>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Smalley <sds@...ho.nsa.gov>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Mickaël Salaün <mic@...ikod.net>,
Salvatore Mesoraca <s.mesoraca16@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/38] LSM: Module stacking for SARA and Landlock
On Mon, Nov 26, 2018 at 3:22 PM Casey Schaufler <casey@...aufler-ca.com> wrote:
> v5: Include Kees Cook's rework of the lsm command
> line interface. Stacking is not conditional.
Can you resend this series with corrected "From:" lines in the body, etc?
Beyond that, I obviously like it. James, what's needed for this to move forward?
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists