linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] lib/lzo: performance improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181205073029.GA30820@jagdpanzerIV>
Date:   Wed, 5 Dec 2018 16:30:29 +0900
From:   Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To:     Dave Rodgman <dave.rodgman@....com>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "herbert@...dor.apana.org.au" <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        "davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Matt Sealey <Matt.Sealey@....com>,
        "nitingupta910@...il.com" <nitingupta910@...il.com>,
        "markus@...rhumer.com" <markus@...rhumer.com>,
        "minchan@...nel.org" <minchan@...nel.org>,
        "sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com" 
        <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
        "sonnyrao@...gle.com" <sonnyrao@...gle.com>,
        "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        nd <nd@....com>, "sfr@...b.auug.org.au" <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/7] lib/lzo: performance improvements

On (11/30/18 14:26), Dave Rodgman wrote:
> 
> This patch series introduces performance improvements for lzo.
> 
> The previous version of this patchset is here:
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/11/30/807
> 
> This version of the patchset fixes a maybe-used-uninitialized warning
> (although the previous version was still safe).

Hi Dave,

Notices this warning today:

lib/lzo/lzo1x_compress.c: In function ‘lzo1x_1_do_compress’:
lib/lzo/lzo1x_compress.c:239:14: warning: ‘m_pos’ may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
239 |   m_off = ip - m_pos;

Care to take a look? (could be false positive)

	-ss