[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKv+Gu-N9j5X4WoFDbQrzeOCfBaNm6ujXe_fAruusE_kWdj8iQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 08:37:05 +0100
From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Cc: Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: Wrap '--pic-veneer' with ld-option
On Wed, 5 Dec 2018 at 02:42, Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com> wrote:
>
> This flag is not supported by lld:
>
> ld.lld: error: unknown argument: --pic-veneer
>
> Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>
Hi Nate,
Does this mean ld.lld is guaranteed to produce position independent
veneers if you build kernels that are bigger than the typical range of
a relative branch?
> ---
> arch/arm/Makefile | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/Makefile b/arch/arm/Makefile
> index e2a0baf36766..4fab2aa29570 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/Makefile
> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
> #
> # Copyright (C) 1995-2001 by Russell King
>
> -LDFLAGS_vmlinux := --no-undefined -X --pic-veneer
> +LDFLAGS_vmlinux := --no-undefined -X $(call ld-option,--pic-veneer)
> ifeq ($(CONFIG_CPU_ENDIAN_BE8),y)
> LDFLAGS_vmlinux += --be8
> KBUILD_LDFLAGS_MODULE += --be8
> --
> 2.20.0.rc1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists