linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 27/45] x86/kvm/vmx: fix old-style function declaration

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181205094706.7225-27-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed,  5 Dec 2018 04:46:48 -0500
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     stable@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Yi Wang <wang.yi59@....com.cn>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 27/45] x86/kvm/vmx: fix old-style function declaration

From: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@....com.cn>

[ Upstream commit 1e4329ee2c52692ea42cc677fb2133519718b34a ]

The inline keyword which is not at the beginning of the function
declaration may trigger the following build warnings, so let's fix it:

arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c:1309:1: warning: ‘inline’ is not at beginning of declaration [-Wold-style-declaration]
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c:5947:1: warning: ‘inline’ is not at beginning of declaration [-Wold-style-declaration]
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c:5985:1: warning: ‘inline’ is not at beginning of declaration [-Wold-style-declaration]
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c:6023:1: warning: ‘inline’ is not at beginning of declaration [-Wold-style-declaration]

Signed-off-by: Yi Wang <wang.yi59@....com.cn>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
index 8888d894bf39..011050820608 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -1077,7 +1077,7 @@ static void copy_vmcs12_to_shadow(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx);
 static void copy_shadow_to_vmcs12(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx);
 static int alloc_identity_pagetable(struct kvm *kvm);
 static void vmx_update_msr_bitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu);
-static void __always_inline vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(unsigned long *msr_bitmap,
+static __always_inline void vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(unsigned long *msr_bitmap,
 							  u32 msr, int type);
 
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct vmcs *, vmxarea);
@@ -4872,7 +4872,7 @@ static void free_vpid(int vpid)
 	spin_unlock(&vmx_vpid_lock);
 }
 
-static void __always_inline vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(unsigned long *msr_bitmap,
+static __always_inline void vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(unsigned long *msr_bitmap,
 							  u32 msr, int type)
 {
 	int f = sizeof(unsigned long);
@@ -4907,7 +4907,7 @@ static void __always_inline vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(unsigned long *msr_bit
 	}
 }
 
-static void __always_inline vmx_enable_intercept_for_msr(unsigned long *msr_bitmap,
+static __always_inline void vmx_enable_intercept_for_msr(unsigned long *msr_bitmap,
 							 u32 msr, int type)
 {
 	int f = sizeof(unsigned long);
@@ -4942,7 +4942,7 @@ static void __always_inline vmx_enable_intercept_for_msr(unsigned long *msr_bitm
 	}
 }
 
-static void __always_inline vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(unsigned long *msr_bitmap,
+static __always_inline void vmx_set_intercept_for_msr(unsigned long *msr_bitmap,
 			     			      u32 msr, int type, bool value)
 {
 	if (value)
-- 
2.17.1