[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a15a43d96bdbfc7201df2ea00e813fb4c0a323a1.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2018 20:33:08 -0500
From: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...lanox.com>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mlx5-next tree with the rdma
tree
FWIW this will go away in a day or two. I merged mlx5-next into rdma
for-next in order to take a series that depended on it.
On Wed, 2018-12-05 at 12:07 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Leon,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the mlx5-next tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/main.c
> drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mlx5_ib.h
>
> between commit:
>
> 36e235c88299 ("RDMA/mlx5: Use the uapi disablement APIs instead of code")
>
> from the rdma tree and commit:
>
> 81773ce5f07f ("RDMA/mlx5: Use stages for callback to setup and release DEVX")
>
> from the mlx5-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
--
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>
GPG KeyID: B826A3330E572FDD
Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B 1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists