[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <35894e57-0429-77a2-a61b-0beb4a285ccb@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 11:42:11 +0100
From: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
To: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Cc: mhocko@...e.com, pavel.tatashin@...rosoft.com, vbabka@...e.cz,
alexander.h.duyck@...ux.intel.com, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm, page_alloc: Drop uneeded __meminit and __meminitdata
On 04.12.18 12:15, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> Since commit 03e85f9d5f1 ("mm/page_alloc: Introduce free_area_init_core_hotplug"),
> some functions changed to only be called during system initialization.
> In concret, free_area_init_node and and the functions that hang from it.
>
> Also, some variables are no longer used after the system has gone
> through initialization.
> So this could be considered as a late clean-up for that patch.
>
> This patch changes the functions from __meminit to __init, and
> the variables from __meminitdata to __initdata.
>
> In return, we get some KBs back:
>
> Before:
> Freeing unused kernel image memory: 2472K
>
> After:
> Freeing unused kernel image memory: 2480K
>
> Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
> ---
> mm/page_alloc.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index fee5e9bad0dd..94e16eba162c 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -266,18 +266,18 @@ int watermark_boost_factor __read_mostly = 15000;
> int watermark_scale_factor = 10;
> int fragment_stall_order __read_mostly = (PAGE_ALLOC_COSTLY_ORDER + 1);
>
> -static unsigned long nr_kernel_pages __meminitdata;
> -static unsigned long nr_all_pages __meminitdata;
> -static unsigned long dma_reserve __meminitdata;
> +static unsigned long nr_kernel_pages __initdata;
> +static unsigned long nr_all_pages __initdata;
> +static unsigned long dma_reserve __initdata;
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP
> -static unsigned long arch_zone_lowest_possible_pfn[MAX_NR_ZONES] __meminitdata;
> -static unsigned long arch_zone_highest_possible_pfn[MAX_NR_ZONES] __meminitdata;
> +static unsigned long arch_zone_lowest_possible_pfn[MAX_NR_ZONES] __initdata;
> +static unsigned long arch_zone_highest_possible_pfn[MAX_NR_ZONES] __initdata;
> static unsigned long required_kernelcore __initdata;
> static unsigned long required_kernelcore_percent __initdata;
> static unsigned long required_movablecore __initdata;
> static unsigned long required_movablecore_percent __initdata;
> -static unsigned long zone_movable_pfn[MAX_NUMNODES] __meminitdata;
> +static unsigned long zone_movable_pfn[MAX_NUMNODES] __initdata;
> static bool mirrored_kernelcore __meminitdata;
>
> /* movable_zone is the "real" zone pages in ZONE_MOVABLE are taken from */
> @@ -6211,7 +6211,7 @@ void __init sparse_memory_present_with_active_regions(int nid)
> * with no available memory, a warning is printed and the start and end
> * PFNs will be 0.
> */
> -void __meminit get_pfn_range_for_nid(unsigned int nid,
> +void __init get_pfn_range_for_nid(unsigned int nid,
> unsigned long *start_pfn, unsigned long *end_pfn)
> {
> unsigned long this_start_pfn, this_end_pfn;
> @@ -6260,7 +6260,7 @@ static void __init find_usable_zone_for_movable(void)
> * highest usable zone for ZONE_MOVABLE. This preserves the assumption that
> * zones within a node are in order of monotonic increases memory addresses
> */
> -static void __meminit adjust_zone_range_for_zone_movable(int nid,
> +static void __init adjust_zone_range_for_zone_movable(int nid,
> unsigned long zone_type,
> unsigned long node_start_pfn,
> unsigned long node_end_pfn,
> @@ -6291,7 +6291,7 @@ static void __meminit adjust_zone_range_for_zone_movable(int nid,
> * Return the number of pages a zone spans in a node, including holes
> * present_pages = zone_spanned_pages_in_node() - zone_absent_pages_in_node()
> */
> -static unsigned long __meminit zone_spanned_pages_in_node(int nid,
> +static unsigned long __init zone_spanned_pages_in_node(int nid,
> unsigned long zone_type,
> unsigned long node_start_pfn,
> unsigned long node_end_pfn,
> @@ -6326,7 +6326,7 @@ static unsigned long __meminit zone_spanned_pages_in_node(int nid,
> * Return the number of holes in a range on a node. If nid is MAX_NUMNODES,
> * then all holes in the requested range will be accounted for.
> */
> -unsigned long __meminit __absent_pages_in_range(int nid,
> +unsigned long __init __absent_pages_in_range(int nid,
> unsigned long range_start_pfn,
> unsigned long range_end_pfn)
> {
> @@ -6356,7 +6356,7 @@ unsigned long __init absent_pages_in_range(unsigned long start_pfn,
> }
>
> /* Return the number of page frames in holes in a zone on a node */
> -static unsigned long __meminit zone_absent_pages_in_node(int nid,
> +static unsigned long __init zone_absent_pages_in_node(int nid,
> unsigned long zone_type,
> unsigned long node_start_pfn,
> unsigned long node_end_pfn,
> @@ -6408,7 +6408,7 @@ static unsigned long __meminit zone_absent_pages_in_node(int nid,
> }
>
> #else /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP */
> -static inline unsigned long __meminit zone_spanned_pages_in_node(int nid,
> +static inline unsigned long __init zone_spanned_pages_in_node(int nid,
> unsigned long zone_type,
> unsigned long node_start_pfn,
> unsigned long node_end_pfn,
> @@ -6427,7 +6427,7 @@ static inline unsigned long __meminit zone_spanned_pages_in_node(int nid,
> return zones_size[zone_type];
> }
>
> -static inline unsigned long __meminit zone_absent_pages_in_node(int nid,
> +static inline unsigned long __init zone_absent_pages_in_node(int nid,
> unsigned long zone_type,
> unsigned long node_start_pfn,
> unsigned long node_end_pfn,
> @@ -6441,7 +6441,7 @@ static inline unsigned long __meminit zone_absent_pages_in_node(int nid,
>
> #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP */
>
> -static void __meminit calculate_node_totalpages(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
> +static void __init calculate_node_totalpages(struct pglist_data *pgdat,
> unsigned long node_start_pfn,
> unsigned long node_end_pfn,
> unsigned long *zones_size,
>
I am in general a friend of fixing up parameter alignment.
Apart from that, looks good to me.
--
Thanks,
David / dhildenb
Powered by blists - more mailing lists