[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8CEBF480-E245-4F7E-A683-D95057CAFFF7@vmware.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 17:28:40 +0000
From: Nadav Amit <namit@...are.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Damian Tometzki <linux_dti@...oud.com>,
"linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org" <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
Rick P Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 13/14] module: Do not set nx for module memory before
freeing
> On Dec 6, 2018, at 1:57 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 05:34:07PM -0800, Nadav Amit wrote:
>
>> So let's remove it. Andy suggested that the changes of the PTEs can be
>> avoided (excluding the direct-mapping alias), which is true. However,
>> in x86 it requires some cleanup of the contiguous page allocator, which
>> is outside of the scope of this patch-set.
>
> I think x86-cpa stands for change_page_attr() :-)
Thanks - it makes much more senseā¦ I took the first thing that Google
showed.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists