[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <63ac9e36-34ac-6a1d-553d-dac5cab98d43@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 19:09:48 +0100
From: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@...wei.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
CC: <zohar@...ux.ibm.com>, <david.safford@...com>,
<monty.wiseman@...com>, <linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <silviu.vlasceanu@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 7/7] tpm: pass an array of tpm_bank_list structures to
tpm_pcr_extend()
On 12/5/2018 1:14 AM, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 09:21:38AM +0100, Roberto Sassu wrote:
>> The new tpm_bank_list structure has been preferred to the tpm_digest
>> structure, to let the caller specify the size of the digest (which may be
>> unknown to the TPM driver).
>
> Why is that? Didn't previous commit query these?
>
>> +struct tpm_bank_list {
>> + u16 alg_id;
>> + u16 extend_size;
>> + const u8 *extend_array;
>> +};
>
> Naming is not good here. If this only for extending shouldn't that
> be in the structs name?
tpm_extend_input?
Roberto
> /Jarkko
>
--
HUAWEI TECHNOLOGIES Duesseldorf GmbH, HRB 56063
Managing Director: Bo PENG, Jian LI, Yanli SHI
Powered by blists - more mailing lists