[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <203a629c-995b-c2c3-4938-1c1494747438@amd.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 18:30:06 +0000
From: "Koenig, Christian" <Christian.Koenig@....com>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>,
"jglisse@...hat.com" <jglisse@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Stéphane Marchesin <marcheu@...omium.org>,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-buf: fix debugfs versus rcu and fence dumping v2
Am 06.12.18 um 17:58 schrieb Chris Wilson:
> Quoting jglisse@...hat.com (2018-12-06 15:47:04)
>> From: Jérôme Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>
>>
>> The debugfs take reference on fence without dropping them. Also the
>> rcu section are not well balance. Fix all that ...
> Wouldn't the code be a lot simpler (and a consistent snapshot) if it used
> reservation_object_get_fences_rcu()?
Yeah, thought about that as well.
Or even better move that code into reservation_object.c as
reservation_object_show_fences() or something like that.
Christian.
> -Chris
Powered by blists - more mailing lists