[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXu5jL8PciZAXvOvCeCU3wKUEB_dU-O3q0tDw4uB_ojMvDEew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 10:30:40 -0800
From: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
To: Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>
Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Daniel Colascione <dancol@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@...lyn.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tim Murray <timmurray@...gle.com>,
linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] signal: add taskfd_send_signal() syscall
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 9:41 AM Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io> wrote:
> I feel changing the name around by a single persons preferences is not
> really a nice thing to do community-wise. So I'd like to hear other
> people chime in first before I make that change.
I don't think the name is hugely critical (but it's always the hardest
to settle on). My preference order would be:
taskfd_send_signal()
pidfd_send_signal()
procfd_send_signal()
fd_send_signal()
But, agreed, I think fdkill() should not be used.
--
Kees Cook
Powered by blists - more mailing lists