[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <02b101d48d43$19ef85c0$4dce9140$@lge.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 18:07:23 +0900
From: "Chanho Min" <chanho.min@....com>
To: "'Pavel Machek'" <pavel@....cz>
Cc: "'Oleg Nesterov'" <oleg@...hat.com>,
"'Ingo Molnar'" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"'Linus Torvalds'" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"'Linux List Kernel Mailing'" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"'Rafael J. Wysocki'" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
"'Thomas Gleixner'" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"'Peter Zijlstra'" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"'Michal Hocko'" <mhocko@...e.com>, <seungho1.park@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] Revert "exec: make de_thread() freezable (was: Re: Linux 4.20-rc4)
> >
> > I am sorry for the reverting this patch. It's also my fault that
> > I didn't check lockdep. But, We decided to keep this patch in our product.
> > Freeze fail is a real problem we've had for the last two years,
> > whereas lockdep's notice is not a real problem.
> > We hope this issue will be resolved soon.
>
> I guess it makes sense for your usage.
>
> How often do you see the failures without the patch?
Very rare, it happens about 1 in 1000 suspends.
Chanho,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists