linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: i2c: use correct vendor prefix for atmel's at24 EEPROMs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20181206104421.a6njveg72dcguckp@katana>
Date:   Thu, 6 Dec 2018 11:44:21 +0100
From:   Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: i2c: use correct vendor prefix for atmel's
 at24 EEPROMs

On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 10:45:50AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> This is a follow-up to Thierry's patch which missed a few occurences.
> 
> Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>

Since I dropped Thierry's original patch, I wonder if it is okay with
you to simply squash these hunks into it?


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)