[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOMZO5CUfN7uLf7bsw6Xg4+TNrRYodw11Ekg5ypqyXU6q-UFtg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 11:11:02 -0200
From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>
To: Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS"
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>,
Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: dts: Add support for Liebherr's BK4 device (vf610 based)
Hi Lukasz,
On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 11:08 AM Lukasz Majewski <lukma@...x.de> wrote:
> I will check this latter this week...
Reading the spi dt-binding it states that the spi slave node is optional.
If I remove it like this, then the warning is gone:
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-bk4.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/vf610-bk4.dts
@@ -109,12 +109,6 @@
bus-num = <3>;
status = "okay";
spi-slave;
-
- slave@0 {
- compatible = "lwn,bk4";
- spi-max-frequency = <30000000>;
- reg = <0>;
- };
};
&edma0 {
Does spi slave still work without it?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists