linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 050/101] libceph: store ceph_auth_handshake pointer in ceph

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181206143014.434108260@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu,  6 Dec 2018 15:38:49 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>,
        Sage Weil <sage@...hat.com>,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 050/101] libceph: store ceph_auth_handshake pointer in ceph_connection

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>

commit 262614c4294d33b1f19e0d18c0091d9c329b544a upstream.

We already copy authorizer_reply_buf and authorizer_reply_buf_len into
ceph_connection.  Factoring out __prepare_write_connect() requires two
more: authorizer_buf and authorizer_buf_len.  Store the pointer to the
handshake in con->auth rather than piling on.

Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Sage Weil <sage@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 include/linux/ceph/messenger.h |    3 --
 net/ceph/messenger.c           |   54 +++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)

--- a/include/linux/ceph/messenger.h
+++ b/include/linux/ceph/messenger.h
@@ -200,9 +200,8 @@ struct ceph_connection {
 				 attempt for this connection, client */
 	u32 peer_global_seq;  /* peer's global seq for this connection */
 
+	struct ceph_auth_handshake *auth;
 	int auth_retry;       /* true if we need a newer authorizer */
-	void *auth_reply_buf;   /* where to put the authorizer reply */
-	int auth_reply_buf_len;
 
 	struct mutex mutex;
 
--- a/net/ceph/messenger.c
+++ b/net/ceph/messenger.c
@@ -1394,24 +1394,26 @@ static void prepare_write_keepalive(stru
  * Connection negotiation.
  */
 
-static struct ceph_auth_handshake *get_connect_authorizer(struct ceph_connection *con,
-						int *auth_proto)
+static int get_connect_authorizer(struct ceph_connection *con)
 {
 	struct ceph_auth_handshake *auth;
+	int auth_proto;
 
 	if (!con->ops->get_authorizer) {
+		con->auth = NULL;
 		con->out_connect.authorizer_protocol = CEPH_AUTH_UNKNOWN;
 		con->out_connect.authorizer_len = 0;
-		return NULL;
+		return 0;
 	}
 
-	auth = con->ops->get_authorizer(con, auth_proto, con->auth_retry);
+	auth = con->ops->get_authorizer(con, &auth_proto, con->auth_retry);
 	if (IS_ERR(auth))
-		return auth;
+		return PTR_ERR(auth);
 
-	con->auth_reply_buf = auth->authorizer_reply_buf;
-	con->auth_reply_buf_len = auth->authorizer_reply_buf_len;
-	return auth;
+	con->auth = auth;
+	con->out_connect.authorizer_protocol = cpu_to_le32(auth_proto);
+	con->out_connect.authorizer_len = cpu_to_le32(auth->authorizer_buf_len);
+	return 0;
 }
 
 /*
@@ -1431,8 +1433,7 @@ static int prepare_write_connect(struct
 {
 	unsigned int global_seq = get_global_seq(con->msgr, 0);
 	int proto;
-	int auth_proto;
-	struct ceph_auth_handshake *auth;
+	int ret;
 
 	switch (con->peer_name.type) {
 	case CEPH_ENTITY_TYPE_MON:
@@ -1459,20 +1460,15 @@ static int prepare_write_connect(struct
 	con->out_connect.protocol_version = cpu_to_le32(proto);
 	con->out_connect.flags = 0;
 
-	auth_proto = CEPH_AUTH_UNKNOWN;
-	auth = get_connect_authorizer(con, &auth_proto);
-	if (IS_ERR(auth))
-		return PTR_ERR(auth);
-
-	con->out_connect.authorizer_protocol = cpu_to_le32(auth_proto);
-	con->out_connect.authorizer_len = auth ?
-		cpu_to_le32(auth->authorizer_buf_len) : 0;
+	ret = get_connect_authorizer(con);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
 
 	con_out_kvec_add(con, sizeof (con->out_connect),
 					&con->out_connect);
-	if (auth && auth->authorizer_buf_len)
-		con_out_kvec_add(con, auth->authorizer_buf_len,
-					auth->authorizer_buf);
+	if (con->auth)
+		con_out_kvec_add(con, con->auth->authorizer_buf_len,
+				 con->auth->authorizer_buf);
 
 	con->out_more = 0;
 	con_flag_set(con, CON_FLAG_WRITE_PENDING);
@@ -1737,11 +1733,14 @@ static int read_partial_connect(struct c
 	if (ret <= 0)
 		goto out;
 
-	size = le32_to_cpu(con->in_reply.authorizer_len);
-	end += size;
-	ret = read_partial(con, end, size, con->auth_reply_buf);
-	if (ret <= 0)
-		goto out;
+	if (con->auth) {
+		size = le32_to_cpu(con->in_reply.authorizer_len);
+		end += size;
+		ret = read_partial(con, end, size,
+				   con->auth->authorizer_reply_buf);
+		if (ret <= 0)
+			goto out;
+	}
 
 	dout("read_partial_connect %p tag %d, con_seq = %u, g_seq = %u\n",
 	     con, (int)con->in_reply.tag,
@@ -1749,7 +1748,6 @@ static int read_partial_connect(struct c
 	     le32_to_cpu(con->in_reply.global_seq));
 out:
 	return ret;
-
 }
 
 /*
@@ -2033,7 +2031,7 @@ static int process_connect(struct ceph_c
 
 	dout("process_connect on %p tag %d\n", con, (int)con->in_tag);
 
-	if (con->auth_reply_buf) {
+	if (con->auth) {
 		/*
 		 * Any connection that defines ->get_authorizer()
 		 * should also define ->verify_authorizer_reply().