linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 065/101] btrfs: validate type when reading a chunk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181206143015.414565735@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu,  6 Dec 2018 15:39:04 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Xu Wen <wen.xu@...ech.edu>,
        Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>, Gu Jinxiang <gujx@...fujitsu.com>,
        David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 065/101] btrfs: validate type when reading a chunk

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@...fujitsu.com>

commit 315409b0098fb2651d86553f0436b70502b29bb2 upstream.

Reported in https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199839, with an
image that has an invalid chunk type but does not return an error.

Add chunk type check in btrfs_check_chunk_valid, to detect the wrong
type combinations.

Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199839
Reported-by: Xu Wen <wen.xu@...ech.edu>
Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@...e.com>
Signed-off-by: Gu Jinxiang <gujx@...fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>
[bwh: Backported to 4.9: Use root->fs_info instead of fs_info]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/btrfs/volumes.c |   28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c
@@ -6370,6 +6370,8 @@ static int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struc
 	u16 num_stripes;
 	u16 sub_stripes;
 	u64 type;
+	u64 features;
+	bool mixed = false;
 
 	length = btrfs_chunk_length(leaf, chunk);
 	stripe_len = btrfs_chunk_stripe_len(leaf, chunk);
@@ -6410,6 +6412,32 @@ static int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struc
 			  btrfs_chunk_type(leaf, chunk));
 		return -EIO;
 	}
+
+	if ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK) == 0) {
+		btrfs_err(root->fs_info, "missing chunk type flag: 0x%llx", type);
+		return -EIO;
+	}
+
+	if ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM) &&
+	    (type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA))) {
+		btrfs_err(root->fs_info,
+			"system chunk with data or metadata type: 0x%llx", type);
+		return -EIO;
+	}
+
+	features = btrfs_super_incompat_flags(root->fs_info->super_copy);
+	if (features & BTRFS_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_MIXED_GROUPS)
+		mixed = true;
+
+	if (!mixed) {
+		if ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA) &&
+		    (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA)) {
+			btrfs_err(root->fs_info,
+			"mixed chunk type in non-mixed mode: 0x%llx", type);
+			return -EIO;
+		}
+	}
+
 	if ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID10 && sub_stripes != 2) ||
 	    (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID1 && num_stripes < 1) ||
 	    (type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID5 && num_stripes < 2) ||