linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.9 059/101] bpf/verifier: Pass instruction index to check_mem_access() and check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20181206143015.012735080@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu,  6 Dec 2018 15:38:58 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 4.9 059/101] bpf/verifier: Pass instruction index to check_mem_access() and check_xadd()

4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>

Extracted from commit 31fd85816dbe "bpf: permits narrower load from
bpf program context fields".

Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 kernel/bpf/verifier.c |   18 +++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -745,7 +745,7 @@ static int check_ptr_alignment(struct bp
  * if t==write && value_regno==-1, some unknown value is stored into memory
  * if t==read && value_regno==-1, don't care what we read from memory
  */
-static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, u32 regno, int off,
+static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, u32 regno, int off,
 			    int bpf_size, enum bpf_access_type t,
 			    int value_regno)
 {
@@ -875,7 +875,7 @@ static int check_mem_access(struct bpf_v
 	return err;
 }
 
-static int check_xadd(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
+static int check_xadd(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, int insn_idx, struct bpf_insn *insn)
 {
 	struct bpf_reg_state *regs = env->cur_state.regs;
 	int err;
@@ -908,13 +908,13 @@ static int check_xadd(struct bpf_verifie
 	}
 
 	/* check whether atomic_add can read the memory */
-	err = check_mem_access(env, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
+	err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
 			       BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_READ, -1);
 	if (err)
 		return err;
 
 	/* check whether atomic_add can write into the same memory */
-	return check_mem_access(env, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
+	return check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
 				BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE, -1);
 }
 
@@ -1270,7 +1270,7 @@ static int check_call(struct bpf_verifie
 	 * is inferred from register state.
 	 */
 	for (i = 0; i < meta.access_size; i++) {
-		err = check_mem_access(env, meta.regno, i, BPF_B, BPF_WRITE, -1);
+		err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, meta.regno, i, BPF_B, BPF_WRITE, -1);
 		if (err)
 			return err;
 	}
@@ -2936,7 +2936,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_
 			/* check that memory (src_reg + off) is readable,
 			 * the state of dst_reg will be updated by this func
 			 */
-			err = check_mem_access(env, insn->src_reg, insn->off,
+			err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->src_reg, insn->off,
 					       BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_READ,
 					       insn->dst_reg);
 			if (err)
@@ -2976,7 +2976,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_
 			enum bpf_reg_type *prev_dst_type, dst_reg_type;
 
 			if (BPF_MODE(insn->code) == BPF_XADD) {
-				err = check_xadd(env, insn);
+				err = check_xadd(env, insn_idx, insn);
 				if (err)
 					return err;
 				insn_idx++;
@@ -2995,7 +2995,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_
 			dst_reg_type = regs[insn->dst_reg].type;
 
 			/* check that memory (dst_reg + off) is writeable */
-			err = check_mem_access(env, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
+			err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
 					       BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE,
 					       insn->src_reg);
 			if (err)
@@ -3030,7 +3030,7 @@ static int do_check(struct bpf_verifier_
 			}
 
 			/* check that memory (dst_reg + off) is writeable */
-			err = check_mem_access(env, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
+			err = check_mem_access(env, insn_idx, insn->dst_reg, insn->off,
 					       BPF_SIZE(insn->code), BPF_WRITE,
 					       -1);
 			if (err)